Ultimate Guide: VAT Refunds for US Businesses

Part I: Foundation and Eligibility – Defining the Cross-Border Recovery Landscape

1.1 Introduction: Unlocking the Multi-Billion Dollar Opportunity

Value-Added Tax (VAT) and similar international consumption taxes represent a significant, often overlooked, financial leakage for US businesses operating overseas. Industry estimates suggest that up to $20 billion in VAT is left unclaimed annually across global jurisdictions. Furthermore, research indicates a substantial lack of confidence within corporate finance teams, with nearly two-thirds (69%) of US companies expressing a lack of confidence in their ability to reclaim VAT incurred by their international travelers.
This deficit highlights the critical need for a structured, compliant approach to cross-border tax recovery, transforming what is often viewed as an administrative burden into a strategic cash flow opportunity.

VAT vs. US Sales Tax

A fundamental challenge for US finance professionals lies in distinguishing foreign consumption tax systems from the domestic sales tax model. In the United States, sales tax is a single-stage tax applied solely at the final point of sale to the consumer, and businesses typically do not receive credits for sales tax paid on their intermediate purchases, and the tax burden is collected and remitted only once.

The VAT system, however, is a multi-stage tax applied at every step of the supply chain, from raw material production through to the final retail transaction. While the consumer ultimately bears the cost, businesses throughout the supply chain collect tax (output tax) and simultaneously claim credits for the tax they have already paid on their inputs (input tax).
For a US business purchasing services or goods overseas for its operations, such as trade show fees or professional consulting, the VAT paid constitutes input tax. When that US business is not established in the foreign country and is not selling taxable goods or services there, the only mechanism to recover this input tax is through specialized non-resident refund schemes.

Defining the Subject Taxes

This guide addresses recovery procedures for the primary foreign consumption taxes encountered by US businesses:

• Value Added Tax (VAT) as used throughout the European Union, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, the United Arab Emirates and South Korea.

• Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Harmonised Sales Tax (HST) as used in Canada.

• Goods and Services Tax (GST) as used in Australia and New Zealand.

• Japanese Consumption Tax (JCT) as used in Japan.

1.2 Eligibility: Non-Established Status

The most crucial prerequisite for utilizing specialized non-resident VAT refund schemes is maintaining a precise non-established tax status in the refunding jurisdiction.

The Non-Established Requirement

To qualify for a refund under schemes such as the EU's 13th VAT Directive or the UK's VAT Notice 723A, a US business must generally meet stringent criteria demonstrating its foreign status. Specifically, the company must not be VAT-registered, established, liable, or required to register for VAT in the country where the tax was incurred.

If a US company's activities within a foreign country, such as holding inventory, selling digital services, or supplying certain taxable goods, require mandatory local VAT registration, the non-resident refund scheme becomes inapplicable.In such cases, the company must claim any input tax credit within its regular, locally-filed VAT return. Consequently, strategic planning is essential to ensure that a business is not inadvertently triggering local VAT registration requirements that would preclude it from using the generally simpler non-resident refund mechanism.

Exceptions to the Local Taxable Activity Rule (EU)

The EU's framework, governed by Directive 2006/112/EC, provides important exceptions to the rule prohibiting local taxable activity. A non-EU business may still be eligible for a refund under the 13th Directive even if it has supplied goods or services in the EU Member State, provided those supplies fall under specific exclusions:

1. Exempted Transport and Ancillary Services: Activities related to international carriage, as defined in Articles 144, 146, 148, 149, 151, 153, 159, or 160 of the VAT Directive.

2. Reverse-Charge Mechanism Supplies: Supplies where the customer (the recipient in the EU) is liable for the payment of the related VAT, thereby shifting the collection responsibility away from the US supplier (Articles 194-197 or 199).

These exceptions allow US freight forwarders or providers of certain cross-border services to recover VAT on local expenses without being penalized for their limited, tax-compliant local presence.

Differentiating Tax Status for Refund vs. Collection

A critical technical distinction exists in the compliance posture required for US businesses seeking recovery across different global regimes, challenging the notion of a standardized internal compliance manual.

In Europe (EU/UK), the focus is on proving the US entity's status as a non-taxable person locally, thereby qualifying for the non-resident refund pathway. The non-established status is the goal.

In Japan, a foreign company often begins as a tax-exempt entity if its taxable sales are below the threshold of ¥10 million. However, tax-exempt entities are prohibited from claiming input JCT credits. Therefore, to recover JCT paid on business purchases, the US entity must strategically opt-in to taxable status. This action requires the US company to register and file JCT returns, proactively waiving its tax-exempt privilege.

This divergence means that US businesses must adopt fundamentally different compliance strategies based on the jurisdiction. In EU and UK territories, the aim is minimizing taxable activity to remain non-established; in Japan, the recovery mechanism necessitates becoming a taxpayer. Failure to recognize this dual standard risks either triggering mandatory registration requirements in the EU (thus complicating recovery) or failing to qualify for recovery entirely in Japan.

1.3 The Reciprocity Hurdle: Navigating the 13th Directive

For US businesses seeking VAT refunds from EU Member States, the Thirteenth Council Directive 86/560/EEC provides the legal basis. However, this framework introduces a significant layer of legal and political complexity through the reciprocity requirement.

The Legal Framework and the Reciprocity Mandate

Under Directive 86/560/EEC, EU Member States retain the right to refuse VAT refunds to non-EU claimants if the claimant’s home country (the United States) does not grant similar reciprocal refund rights for VAT or comparable taxes to businesses established in that Member State. Furthermore, Member States may impose restrictions on the types of expenditure that qualify for refunds and may insist that the claimant appoint a tax representative.

This provision ensures that refunds made to non-EU taxable persons are not offered on more favorable conditions than those extended to taxable persons established within the European Economic Community (EEC).

Reciprocity in Practice

The reciprocity clause transforms eligibility from a purely technical compliance exercise into a geopolitical assessment. While the general EU mechanism exists for US companies, individual states interpret and enforce reciprocity differently.

This creates a paradox: a US company may technically meet all administrative requirements, yet have its claim denied based on a bilateral tax policy decision outside the finance manager’s control. For example, France has historically maintained a strict stance, requiring countries to appear on a specific list set by the Minister responsible for the budget to grant comparable advantages. To date, official information suggests that no country or territory appears on this list, implying a systematic barrier for US companies claiming VAT in France under this procedure. Conversely, Germany has been noted to have comparable tax agreements with some nations, suggesting potential eligibility for US-based firms in that jurisdiction.

Tax professionals must therefore perform due diligence on the specific bilateral tax relationship between the US and the EU Member State of expenditure. A failure to clear this political hurdle results in a 100% loss of the attempted tax recovery for that jurisdiction.

Filing and Critical Deadlines

Strict adherence to filing deadlines and minimum claim thresholds is essential for success. Deadlines are non-negotiable tax dates.

EU 13th Directive Claims:

• Annual Requirement: The claim period covers the previous calendar year (N). The standard filing deadline for the EU 13th Directive is June 30th of the calendar year following the year in which the tax was paid (N + 1).5 For instance, VAT incurred in 2024 must be claimed by June 30, 2025.

• Filing Frequency: Claims may be submitted quarterly or annually. Quarterly submissions may be filed at any time before the final annual deadline.

• Minimum Claim Thresholds: Jurisdictions impose minimum amounts to prevent excessively small claims. For quarterly claims (less than one year), the minimum amount of VAT owed before a refund is generally honored is €400. For annual claims, this minimum threshold drops significantly, typically to €50.5 A maximum of five claims (four quarterly and one annual adjustment) can be made in any one year.

The specialized non-resident refund systems operate on claim cycles that differ from general tax returns, necessitating dedicated tracking. The following table summarizes the primary compliance deadlines.

Critical Filing Deadlines for US VAT Reclaim

Under the EU Thirteenth Directive, US companies must submit their refund application for VAT incurred during the previous calendar year by 30 June of the following year. Claims may be submitted quarterly, provided they meet the typical minimum threshold of approximately four hundred euros, or annually, where the minimum threshold is lower, usually around fifty euros. Member States follow this general timetable, although exact administrative requirements must always be checked locally.

• For the United Kingdom, the refund period runs from 1 July to 30 June, and the claim must be filed by 31 December following the end of that period. This UK cycle is unique and does not follow the EU’s calendar-year approach.

• In Canada, the Foreign Convention and Tour Incentive Program (FCTIP) requires non-resident exhibitors to file their GST or HST rebate application within one year after the convention ends. This scheme is limited to convention and exhibition expenses rather than general business purchases.

• In Switzerland, foreign businesses must file their annual VAT refund application for the prior calendar year by 30 June of the following year. Switzerland operates a strict one-claim-per-year rule, and late submissions are not permitted.

• Norway also requires non-resident businesses to submit their annual VAT refund application by 30 June of the year following the period in which the VAT was incurred. Norway does not apply reciprocity, so US companies follow the standard non-resident timetable.

• Iceland allows refund periods ranging from a minimum of two months up to a full calendar year. Applications must be submitted shortly after the end of the claim period, and minimum VAT thresholds apply. Timelines can vary depending on the period selected, so claimants must confirm the exact date applicable to their filing window.

• In the United Arab Emirates, non-resident businesses using the business visitor refund scheme submit claims on an annual basis, with the Federal Tax Authority typically accepting applications for a given year between 1 March and 31 August of the following year, subject to a minimum VAT amount.

• South Korea generally requires non-resident VAT refund applications to be submitted by 30 June of the year following the year in which the expenses were incurred. Refunds apply only to specific categories of business expenditure.

• New Zealand does not operate a standalone refund scheme. Instead, overseas companies must register as non-resident business claimants to obtain GST recovery. Filing deadlines depend on the GST return cycle assigned at registration, which may be monthly, two-monthly or six-monthly. Refunds must therefore be submitted in line with the claimant’s assigned GST return dates.

• Australia similarly does not offer a non-resident refund mechanism. A foreign business seeking to recover GST must register for GST and file Business Activity Statements (BAS) on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis as determined at registration. Refund timing therefore follows the entity’s assigned BAS lodgement cycle rather than a fixed annual deadline.

• Japan requires foreign companies seeking to recover Japanese Consumption Tax to opt in to taxable status and file a standard annual JCT return. The filing deadline is linked to the company’s financial year end, with the return typically due within two months after the close of the fiscal year unless an extension is granted. Refunds are processed through this annual return rather than through a separate non-resident scheme.

Part II: The European Union (EU) Refund Mechanism (13th Directive in Practice)

2.1 Procedural Requirements and Documentation for 13th Directive Claims

Successful VAT recovery hinges entirely on procedural accuracy and robust documentation. Tax authorities maintain high standards for non-resident claims due to the heightened risk of fraud.

Registration and Application Process

US businesses must first register their entity with the foreign tax authority where the VAT was incurred. This registration proves the company is a legitimate business operating outside the country. Crucially, this is a registration to claim a refund and should not be mistaken for registering to collect or remit local VAT, which would invalidate the 13th Directive claim.

Applications are increasingly mandated through electronic portals. For example, US companies seeking German VAT recovery must electronically submit the refund claim via the Federal Central Tax Office (BZSt) online portal (BOP).This process requires the US entity to register once via the BZSt registration form to obtain access data for the BOP.

Documentation Thresholds and Standards

Authorities universally demand comprehensive proof to validate claims, requiring original invoices, original receipts, and specific proof of export for any claimed goods. The standard EU rules require supporting documents when the amount before tax exceeds a specific threshold: €1,000 for standard invoices, or €250 for purchases concerning fuel.

Invoice Detail Mandate:

To be considered valid for input tax recovery, invoices must meet stringent criteria, generally showing 21:

• An identifying number.

• The supplier's name, address, and VAT registration number.

• The claimant US company’s name and address.

• Details and date of goods or services supplied.

• The cost of the goods or services (excluding VAT).

• The applicable rate of VAT.

• The precise amount of VAT charged.

Tax authorities may request original business documents and clarification regarding the nature of the expenses. Claimants are typically granted a limited timeframe, often 30 days, to respond to such requests, emphasizing the need for organized document retention.

Reclaiming Input Tax on Overhead vs. Direct Costs

The recoverability percentage can differ significantly based on whether the expense relates to direct business costs or general overhead.

• Direct Costs: If the expense directly supports VAT-taxable sales, such as raw materials purchased for export, the US business can generally recover 100% of the VAT paid, provided the activity remains non-established.

• General Overhead Costs: Expenses that support overall business operations (e.g., office rent, accounting services used by an established branch) are more complex. Recovery often depends on what percentage of the US company's revenue comes from VAT-taxable vs. VAT-exempt activities globally. This is calculated using a "pro rata" method. For example, if 80% of a company's total revenue is VAT-taxable, only 80% of the VAT paid on general overhead costs would be recoverable.

2.2 Classifying Recoverable vs. Non-Recoverable Expenses (EU/UK Focus)

VAT refund eligibility is not universal across expense types; each EU Member State retains the ability to impose restrictions on specific categories of expenditure. Compliance teams must scrutinize local country rules to prevent rejection of claims based on the non-recoverable nature of the expense.

Mandatory Expenditure Codes

When preparing a refund claim, the US business must classify the goods and services acquired using standardized EU expenditure codes:

• Code 1: Fuel.

• Code 6: Accommodation.

• Code 7: Food, drink, and restaurant services.

• Code 8: Admissions to fairs and exhibitions.

• Code 9: Expenditure on luxuries, amusements, and entertainment.

• Code 10: Other (for professional services, etc.).

Some EU countries require the use of additional sub-codes for further description.

High-Recovery Categories

Expenses incurred during international business travel, participation in events, and acquisition of necessary professional services typically fall into high-recovery categories, provided the underlying transaction is for legitimate business purposes:

• Trade Fairs and Exhibitions: Registration fees, admission costs, and related exhibition expenses are commonly eligible for refunds.

• Accommodation and Travel: Costs for lodging (hotel rooms), means of transport (car rental, taxi fares, rail travel), and road tolls are generally recoverable when undertaken in connection with the employer's business.

• Professional Services: Fees for legal, accounting, tax advice, and other essential business services are typically recoverable.

High-Risk and Blocked Categories

Certain expenditure categories carry significant risk of rejection due to local restrictions, particularly those concerning hospitality, meals, and entertainment.

• Entertainment and Luxuries (Code 9): VAT on client entertainment is frequently blocked for reclaim.22 This is often interpreted broadly to include taking clients out to dinner or providing event tickets.

• Meals and Restaurant Services (Code 7): While essential business subsistence for employees is often recoverable, VAT on food, drink, and restaurant services is a frequent target for restriction by Member States.

• Apportionment and Subsistence (UK Example): The UK provides a clear example of complex apportionment rules. While VAT on client entertainment is generally blocked, if an employee travels and entertains a client overnight, the VAT paid on the employee’s subsistence element (e.g., their own meal or hotel cost) may be recoverable, as this expense would have been incurred regardless of the client’s presence. VAT incurred specifically for the client remains non-recoverable.26 This necessitates strict line-item separation on invoices and meticulous record-keeping.

Common Recoverable and Non-Recoverable Expenses (EU/UK Focus)

Trade fair and exhibition fees are generally fully recoverable, provided the costs relate directly to business promotion. These expenses fall under the EU’s expenditure code for admissions to fairs and exhibitions, which is Code 8.

Hotel accommodation used for essential business travel is also typically one hundred percent recoverable, although individual Member States may impose their own limitations. Germany, for example, permits recovery on hotel accommodation, but businesses should always verify local rules. These costs are categorised under accommodation, or Code 6.

Client entertainment is generally blocked and treated as a non-recoverable expense across most EU countries and in the United Kingdom. Limited exceptions may apply where a portion of the cost can be attributed to an employee’s own subsistence while travelling, or in rare cases where entertaining an overseas client is considered reasonable. Entertainment falls under the EU’s classification for luxuries, amusements and entertainment, which is Code 9.

Professional services such as legal advice, consulting, and similar business-related expertise are usually recoverable in full. However, these services may fall under reverse-charge rules, meaning the VAT treatment depends on whether the supplier was required to charge VAT in the first place. Accurate invoice management is essential to ensure that the correct tax was applied. These services fall under the “Other” category, listed as Code 10.

Road tolls and road user charges incurred for business transport are normally fully recoverable, provided the expense is linked to legitimate business travel. These charges are classified under the EU expenditure category for road tolls and user fees, which is Code 4.

Part III: Global Refund Regimes: UK, Canada, and Japan

3.1 The UK (Post-Brexit) Refund Scheme (VAT Notice 723A)

Following its departure from the EU, the United Kingdom instituted its own independent scheme for non-EU/non-UK businesses, offering a simplified and more certain framework for US claimants compared to the EU’s reciprocity-dependent mechanism. This scheme is governed by domestic UK law, primarily outlined in VAT Notice 723A.

Eligibility and Legal Basis

US businesses can use the UK VAT refund scheme if they meet strict criteria demonstrating non-establishment 8:

• The claimant must be registered as a business outside the UK.

• The business must not be registered, liable, or eligible to be registered for VAT in the UK.

• The business must not have a place of business or other residence in the UK.

• The business cannot make any supplies in the UK, save for transport services related to the international carriage of goods, or supplies where the UK customer pays the VAT (reverse charge supplies).

The scheme covers VAT paid on imports into the UK and purchases of goods and services used within the UK for business purposes, such as participation in a trade fair.

Procedure and Required Forms

The process requires the submission of specific forms to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). US companies must use the VAT65A form to claim a refund of VAT paid. Additionally, the status of the overseas business must be verified using Form VAT66A, which serves as the required Certificate of Status recognized by HMRC.

Documentation Standards (UK Specificity)

UK documentation requirements follow the general strictness of tax authorities but offer slight simplification for low-value purchases. Standard supplies must be supported by invoices showing full supplier and claimant details, VAT rate, and amount.

However, if the value of a supply is £250 or less (including VAT), the invoice only needs to show the supplier's details, the date of supply, details of the goods or services, the cost (including VAT), and the VAT rate. This distinction provides a small administrative advantage for managing high volumes of minor expenses.

3.2 Canadian GST/HST Recovery for Non-Resident Businesses

The Canadian tax landscape differs significantly, utilizing the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST, which includes a provincial component). For non-resident US businesses, recovery is narrowly focused, primarily through specialized programs targeting conventions and the export of goods.

Focus on the Foreign Convention and Tour Incentive Program (FCTIP)

The most common recovery pathway for US businesses is the FCTIP, designed to rebate tax paid on activities related to international conventions. Non-resident, non-registered exhibitors can claim a rebate of the GST/HST paid on rented exhibition space and certain related convention supplies.

• Related Convention Supplies: Eligible expenses include equipment rental and specific lodging costs. Importantly, the rebate is only applicable to accommodation deemed a "related convention supply." For instance, an exhibitor may claim a rebate on six nights of lodging used exclusively for the convention, but not for additional personal or non-convention-related nights.

• The 50% Restriction (Critical Caveat): The FCTIP imposes a strict limitation on food and beverage costs. A rebate is only available for 50% of the GST/HST paid for food, beverages, or items supplied under a catering contract. This mandates that US companies meticulously track and apportion these specific costs for Canadian events to avoid claiming non-eligible amounts.

• Filing Requirements: Claims are filed using form GST386, Rebate Application for Foreign Conventions. A non-resident exhibitor is limited to one rebate claim per convention, which must be filed within one year after the convention ends.

Rebate for Exported Goods

A general rebate is also available for non-residents who purchase goods in Canada and export them. The US business must have received the goods in Canada, paid the GST/HST, and subsequently exported the goods from Canada within 60 days after delivery (via personal carriage, mail, or common carrier). The goods must be for use primarily outside Canada, and the business must not be considered a "consumer" of the goods.

3.3 Japan Consumption Tax (JCT) Recovery: The Opt-In Strategy

Japan’s Consumption Tax (JCT) system presents a fundamentally unique challenge for US businesses seeking refunds, as it requires a strategic decision to become a taxable entity.

The Default Tax-Exempt Status

JCT applies to domestic transactions, imports, and cross-border provisions of services. However, foreign enterprises whose taxable sales fall below a threshold (currently ¥10 million for the base period) are generally categorized as tax-exempt enterprises and are exempt from JCT filing and liability.

The Strategic Opt-In

The critical strategic distinction in Japan is that tax-exempt enterprises cannot claim input JCT credits because they are not required to remit output tax. Consequently, a US company must proactively waive its tax-exempt status and submit a notification form to change its designation to a "business subject to taxation" (regular taxation method).

This voluntary commitment to standard taxation is a significant long-term compliance decision. Once an enterprise opts for standard taxation to enable input tax recovery, it is typically bound to that status for a minimum period (which, by comparison to similar mechanisms like the German VAT exemption rule, often lasts for five calendar years). This requires the US business to prepare and file annual JCT returns, and potentially remit any collected JCT on local sales for the duration of its taxable status.

Recovery Mechanism and Documentation

Once the opt-in status is secured, JCT recovery occurs through the standard filing of the annual consumption tax return (using Form 1 and Form 2).11 For many non-established US companies, the output tax collected on their limited activities in Japan may be zero, meaning the input tax paid on purchases is refunded as the difference.

A key documentation requirement, particularly relevant under Japan's Qualified Invoice System, is that businesses can only deduct input consumption tax if they have received a qualified invoice from a registered qualified invoice issuer. Compliance teams must verify that Japanese suppliers adhere to this system when issuing invoices to ensure deductibility.

Part IV: Compliance, Documentation, and Pitfalls

4.1 Mitigating Rejection Risk: The Importance of Documentation

Despite clear legal guidance, VAT refund claims frequently encounter rejection. Data from the European Commission indicates that the three most common reasons for claims being rejected, either wholly or in part, are: "VAT incorrectly charged by supplier," "Lack of evidence of business purpose," and "VAT not eligible for refund based on nature of the expense".

Supplier Errors Leading to Rejection

A substantial portion of rejections stems from errors made by the foreign supplier, not the US claimant. Claims are rejected when the supplier incorrectly applied VAT, so for instance, by charging VAT on transactions that should have been subject to the reverse-charge mechanism, or by applying incorrect tax rates (such as charging a standard rate on a purchase that should be exempt or zero-rated). The burden of proof often falls back on the US claimant to demonstrate that the tax invoiced was "well-founded". This requires sophisticated vetting of foreign invoices at the point of receipt.

Claimant Failures and Internal Controls

Internal compliance breakdowns within the US company are also major drivers of rejection:

• Invalid or Insufficient Documentation: This is cited as a leading reason for denial. Required tax invoices may be incomplete, lacking the supplier's VAT number or the correct VAT amount. Furthermore, adequate proof of payment (such as bank statements or detailed receipts) must accompany the invoice.

• Lack of Evidence of Business Purpose: Tax administrations must be satisfied that the expenses were legitimately incurred for the taxable business carried on by the US entity. Failure to clearly link the expenditure (e.g., travel, accommodation) to a core business activity overseas will result in rejection.

• Invoicing in the Incorrect Entity Name: Expenses must be documented under the name of the legal US entity claiming the refund, not under the name of an individual traveler, employee, or a mismatched affiliate entity.

• Calculation Errors: Mistakes in calculating the VAT refund amount, such as claiming input VAT that exceeds the amount on the invoices, or using incorrect tax rates, are common and lead to rejections.

• Bank Account Mismatch: Authorities will reject refund requests if the designated bank account details (including the bank account name or IBAN) do not precisely match the business name registered with the tax authority.

• Failure to Respond to Requests: Tax authorities frequently issue requests for additional information to scrutinize claims. A failure to respond promptly, typically within 30 days in many EU Member States, results in the immediate rejection of the claim.

4.2 Filing Procedures and Tracking: A Guide to Administrative Flow

The administrative process of claiming foreign VAT is characterized by mandatory electronic submission, high compliance oversight, and often lengthy processing times.

Electronic Submission Mandates

Most sophisticated jurisdictions require electronic submission of refund applications. As noted, the German Federal Central Tax Office (BZSt) mandates use of the BZSt Online Portal (BOP). These electronic systems necessitate prior registration and adherence to specific data formats, reinforcing the need for adequate digital infrastructure within the claimant's organization.

Tracking and Interest Claims

The VAT refund process can be protracted, and businesses should treat applications not as a submission-and-wait task, but as an actively managed compliance process.

A strategic consideration for managing long delays is the right to claim interest. If a foreign tax administration is late in refunding the claimed VAT, the claimant may be able to claim interest on the delayed payment. This provision serves as a partial offset to administrative delays and provides an incentive for businesses to actively monitor the processing timelines of their claims.

Part V: Strategic Recovery and Future Trends

5.1 Optimizing Recovery: Internal vs. Outsourced Management

The potential for VAT recovery, which can amount to up to 25% of an international budget, must be weighed against the internal administrative complexity. Many US companies struggle with VAT administration due to language barriers, the sheer volume of documentation, and the constant flux of local regulations. One large US university, for example, discontinued its outsourced VAT recovery process due to the "cost and low recovery rate because of all the country restrictions and limitations," illustrating that even managed solutions must be highly effective to be worthwhile.

Specialized VAT Recovery Agencies (Managed Service)

Specialized VAT recovery agencies, such as Antravia Advisory, provide a full-service solution, leveraging their established network and local expertise to handle the administrative load and ensure compliance with the varying local regulations.

Fee Structure (Contingency Basis): The dominant model for agency engagement is the contingent fee, or "no win, no fee" approach. The agency charges a commission only on the amounts successfully recovered. This mitigates the financial risk for the US company, as fees are not incurred for rejected or uncollectable amounts. Contingent fees typically range between 2% and 25% of the recovered VAT amount, depending on the complexity, volume, and age of the outstanding debt.

VAT Recovery Software Solutions

A secondary approach involves utilizing dedicated VAT recovery software, which focuses on efficiency through automation. These platforms often incorporate optical character recognition (OCR) and deep learning to categorize expenses, extract data from invoices and receipts automatically, and perform initial compliance checks. They also provide integration capabilities with existing accounting and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems.

However, reliance solely on software presents limitations. While software excels at data processing, it cannot typically navigate the highly nuanced legal requirements of foreign tax authorities, such as the specific local interpretations of non-recoverable expenses or the complex political hurdles like the reciprocity mandate. A successful strategy often requires integrating software efficiency with the specialized human expertise provided by managed service partners.

5.2 The Future of Foreign VAT: Digitalization and E-Invoicing Mandates

The environment for VAT compliance is undergoing a rapid, global digital transformation that will fundamentally change the requirements for documentation and validation, making current paper-based processes obsolete.

The Global Shift to Real-Time Compliance

Governments worldwide are accelerating the implementation of mandatory Business-to-Business (B2B) electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) systems. This shift, exemplified by the EU’s strategy to accelerate e-invoicing adoption and national mandates in countries like Croatia and Angola (mandated for large taxpayers starting January 1, 2026), aims to reduce fraud and streamline digital tax administration. These systems require invoices to be machine-readable and transmitted digitally via authorized government or accredited platforms.

E-Invoicing and the Obsolescence of Paper Documentation

Currently, VAT refund claims heavily rely on the submission of physical "original invoices" and receipts.In the near future, tax authorities transitioning to e-invoicing will begin validating input tax credits based on the presence of a compliant, digitally transmitted e-invoice in their governmental system.

The implication is important: US companies must prepare for a future where traditional paper invoices (or even scanned PDF copies) provided by foreign suppliers may be deemed non-compliant because they lack the necessary metadata or transmission integrity required by the new regulations. This represents a new, high-stakes documentation failure risk. CFOs must ensure that their expense management and VAT recovery solutions are integrating capabilities to handle standardized digital invoice formats, such as those mandated by emerging standards like Peppol, to safeguard long-term VAT recovery success.

5.3 Conclusion: Compliance as a Competitive Advantage

Cross-border VAT recovery represents a substantial, recoverable cash flow asset for US businesses engaged in international activities. The financial impact of ignoring these systems is significant, estimated in the billions of dollars annually. Transforming this leakage into recovered capital requires moving beyond fragmented, ad-hoc processes and adopting a specialized, systematic compliance structure.

The analysis confirms that successful recovery demands granular attention to regional procedural variances. For US businesses, the pathway to recovery is defined by several distinct pillars: the non established regime of the EU, governed by the Thirteenth Directive and constrained by country specific reciprocity requirements; the defined post Brexit rules of the United Kingdom; the convention focused rebates in Canada; the strategic requirement to voluntarily register as a taxpayer to claim Japanese Consumption Tax; the non resident refund frameworks in Switzerland, Norway and Iceland; the business visitor refund and event schemes in the United Arab Emirates; and the non resident refund and registration models in South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. The necessity to prove non taxable status in Europe, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and the UK, compared with the need to opt in to taxable status in Japan or register under GST style systems in Australia and New Zealand, is a critical administrative dichotomy that prevents the adoption of a universal compliance manual.

Looking forward, the global digital tax mandate, particularly the aggressive push toward B2B e-invoicing, will fundamentally shift the requirements for compliant documentation. The administrative challenge will evolve from collecting and validating paper invoices to ensuring seamless integration with mandatory real-time digital invoicing platforms. Firms that prioritize investment in specialized expertise, whether through high-quality managed services or integrated software solutions, will be best positioned to mitigate rejection risks and efficiently convert foreign tax expenditures into recovered corporate capital.

Cross-Border VAT/Tax Refund Mechanism Comparison for US Businesses

The European Union offers a dedicated non resident refund mechanism for US businesses under the Thirteenth Directive. This regime applies across all EU Member States and allows recovery of VAT on eligible business expenses when the US company is not established, not VAT registered and has made no locally taxable supplies, apart from limited exceptions such as reverse charge transactions or certain exempt transport services. Eligibility is subject to each Member State’s reciprocity rules, which determine whether the United States is recognised as a jurisdiction that grants comparable rights to EU businesses.

The United Kingdom operates its own post Brexit VAT refund mechanism under VAT Notice 723A. This scheme is available to non established businesses that are not registered for VAT in the UK, are not liable to register and have no place of business or fixed establishment in the UK. Unlike the EU system, the UK does not apply a reciprocity requirement, making the scheme more accessible for US companies.

Canada provides a restricted refund pathway through the Foreign Convention and Tour Incentive Program. This mechanism applies only to specific GST and HST costs connected to conventions or exported goods. Eligibility is limited to non resident, non registered exhibitors or suppliers, and the scheme does not extend to general business expenditure. Reciprocity is not part of the Canadian framework.

Japan allows foreign businesses to recover Japanese Consumption Tax only if they voluntarily opt in to taxable status. A US company must waive its default tax exempt position, register as a taxable enterprise and file an annual JCT return. The refund arises through the normal return cycle rather than a standalone non resident scheme. Reciprocity does not apply in Japan.

Switzerland provides a non resident VAT refund mechanism for foreign companies that incur Swiss VAT and are not registered or required to register locally. Claims are permitted on business expenses such as accommodation, events and services, subject to meeting Switzerland’s reciprocity requirements. The United States is generally recognised, but eligibility should always be confirmed in advance.

Norway offers a clear non resident refund system for foreign companies that have no VAT registration and no taxable turnover in Norway. Unlike Switzerland and some EU Member States, Norway does not apply reciprocity, so US businesses qualify under standard rules.

Iceland operates a VAT refund system for non resident businesses that purchase goods or services for commercial purposes in Iceland and do not have a permanent establishment there. Refund periods and thresholds vary, but reciprocity is not a barrier for US companies.

The United Arab Emirates allows VAT refunds for foreign businesses through its business visitor refund scheme. US companies may claim UAE VAT incurred on eligible expenses when they are not established in the UAE and not required to register for VAT. The scheme does not apply to businesses established in GCC states that do not offer reciprocal treatment, but this condition does not affect US claimants.

South Korea provides a non resident VAT refund mechanism for certain business expenditures incurred by foreign entities without a permanent establishment in Korea. Claims must meet Korea’s specific criteria for business relevance. Reciprocity is not a feature of the Korean system.

Australia does not operate a non resident refund scheme. A foreign business must register for GST and file Business Activity Statements to recover GST on eligible expenses. Recovery therefore follows standard GST rules, and there is no concept of reciprocity.

New Zealand also does not offer a standalone non resident refund scheme. Instead, US businesses may register as non resident business claimants in order to recover GST on New Zealand expenses. Claims are made through periodic GST returns, and reciprocity plays no role in eligibility.

References

• Billtrust – E-Invoicing and Compliance Updates
  https://www.billtrust.com/resources/blog/einvoicing-and-compliance-updates-july-2025

• BZSt – Electronic Data Transmission for VAT Refund Applications
  https://www.bzst.de/EN/Businesses/VAT/VAT_Refund/Electronic_Data_Transmission/electronic_data_transmission_node.html

• BZSt – VAT Refund Procedure
  https://www.bzst.de/EN/Businesses/VAT/VAT_Refund/input_vat_refund_procedure_node.html

• Canada Revenue Agency – Foreign Convention and Tour Incentive Program (FCTIP)
  https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/forms-publications/publications/gi-028/foreign-convention-tour-incentive-program-non-resident-exhibitors-application-gst-hst-purchases-rebate-purchases.html

• Canada Revenue Agency – GST/HST Rebates for Exported Goods
  https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/forms-publications/publications/rc4033/general-application-gst-hst-rebates.html

• Debenhams Ottaway – Contingency Fee Structure for Commercial Debt Recovery
  https://www.debenhamsottaway.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Debt-Recovery-price-list-1.pdf

• European Commission – Common Reasons for VAT Refund Rejections
  https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-07/20190620_final_report_vat_refunds.pdf

• European Commission – Thirteenth Council Directive 86/560/EEC
  https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/taxation/vat/vat-directive/vat-refunds_en

• EUR-Lex – Summary of Directive 86/560/EEC
  https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/refunds-to-non-eec-taxable-persons-13th-vat-directive.html

• Fiscalead – Eligibility for 13th Directive Refunds in France
  https://www.fiscalead.com/en/vat-reclaim-how-it-works-key-considerations-and-best-practices/

• Gov.uk – VAT Refunds for Non-UK Businesses (VAT Notice 723A)
  https://www.gov.uk/guidance/refunds-of-uk-vat-for-non-uk-businesses-or-eu-vat-for-uk-businesses

• Gov.uk – VAT Refunds for Non-EU Businesses Visiting the UK
  https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-refunds-for-non-eu-businesses-visiting-the-uk

• HMRC VAT Finance Manual – Agency Debt Collection
  https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/vat-finance-manual/vatfin3255

• JETRO – JCT Filing Requirements and Tax-Exempt Status
  https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/section3/page6.html

• KPMG – Global E-Invoicing Updates
  https://kpmg.com/us/en/taxnewsflash/indirect-tax.html

• PR Newswire – VAT Refund: How US Companies Recover up to 25 Percent
  https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vat-refund---how-us-companies-can-recover-up-to-25-percent-of-their-international-budget-300530946.html

• Rödl & Partner – German VAT Recovery Guidance
  https://www.roedl.com/insights/vat-guidelines/germany-rate-registration-declaration-requirements

• SAP Concur – US Companies Failing to Reclaim VAT Research
  https://www.concur.com/blog/article/research-reveals-nearly-two-thirds-us-companies-fail-reclaim-vat-us-travelers

• Sales Tax Institute – VAT vs Sales Tax Overview
  https://www.salestaxinstitute.com/vat-vs-sales-tax-differences

• Stripe – Japan Consumption Tax Refund Process
  https://stripe.com/resources/more/cross-border-ec-consumption-tax-in-japan

• Stripe – Japanese Qualified Invoice System
  https://stripe.com/resources/more/what-is-japanese-consumption-tax

• Stripe – VAT Exemption and International VAT Transactions (Germany)
  https://stripe.com/resources/more/vat-exemption-germany
  https://stripe.com/resources/more/vat-international-transactions-germany

• University of Wisconsin – VAT Compliance and Reporting Overview
  https://businessservices.wisc.edu/accounting/tax-compliance-and-reporting/value-added-tax/

• Young & Right – Reasons VAT Refund Applications Get Rejected (UAE)
  https://www.youngandright.ae/blogs/common-reasons-why-vat-refund-applications-get-rejected-and-how-to-avoid-them/

• Your Europe (EU Commission Portal) – VAT Refunds for Non-EU Businesses
  https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/taxation/vat/vat-refunds/index_en.htm

Not sure where to start? Antravia free Consultation

Disclaimer:
Content published by Antravia is provided for informational purposes only and reflects research, industry analysis, and our professional perspective. It does not constitute legal, tax, or accounting advice. Regulations vary by jurisdiction, and individual circumstances differ. Readers should seek advice from a qualified professional before making decisions that could affect their business.
See also our Disclaimer page